Allahabad High Court Orders Demolition of Two Illegal 10-Storey Towers at Ghaziabad’s Gulmohar Greens

Court directs demolition within two months, imposes ₹25 lakh penalty on builder and orders refunds to affected buyers with 10% interest

AI Generated Image

By The Realty Times | Real Estate News Services

Ghaziabad : In a major ruling against unauthorised construction in the real estate sector, the Allahabad High Court has ordered the demolition of two 10-storey residential towers at the Gulmohar Greens housing society in Ghaziabad. The court also directed the demolition of unauthorised additional floors in four other towers, imposed a ₹25 lakh penalty on the builder and ordered criminal proceedings against the project promoter.

The judgment, delivered by a division bench comprising Justice Saral Srivastava and Justice Sudhanshu Chauhan, is a significant development for homebuyers and real estate developers, highlighting the legal consequences of violating sanctioned building plans and the responsibility of development authorities to enforce construction regulations.

According to reports published on October 28 and 29, 2026, the court directed the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) to demolish the disputed structures within two months. The order followed petitions filed by residents and the Gulmohar Greens Residents Welfare Association challenging approvals granted for unauthorised construction.

Two Towers to Be Demolished

The court has ordered the complete demolition of Towers 27 and 28 at Gulmohar Greens. It has also directed the removal of the ninth and tenth floors of Towers 16, 17, 18 and 19, which exceeded the originally sanctioned building plans.

The two towers marked for complete demolition reportedly contain around 80 unoccupied flats. The unauthorised floors in the four other towers account for 32 flats that are still under construction.

The GDA has been instructed to carry out the demolition within the prescribed period, with the police and district administration providing the necessary security and assistance. The court has also permitted the authority to recover the demolition expenses from the promoter as arrears of land revenue.

Court Rejects Approval for Unauthorised Construction

The dispute centres on the builder's alleged deviations from the originally approved building plans and subsequent attempts to regularise the additional construction.

The project was initially planned for 34 towers comprising 904 residential units. However, residents alleged that additional units and structural changes were introduced without the necessary legal approvals and consent from apartment owners.

The court set aside the GDA's third compounding order, dated December 18, 2024, which had sought to regularise the disputed construction. It held that the deviations were not legally eligible for regularisation.

In its judgment, the court also criticised the conduct of officials at the development authority, finding serious lapses in the approval process. The ruling underscores that payment of a compounding fee cannot automatically legalise construction that violates applicable regulations.

₹25 Lakh Penalty and FIR Against the Promoter

The High Court directed the promoter, Friends Land Developers, to deposit ₹25 lakh with the Gulmohar Greens Residents Welfare Association within one month.

It also ordered the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against the promoter within two weeks in connection with alleged fraud, misrepresentation and violations of the Uttar Pradesh Apartment (Promotion of Construction, Ownership and Maintenance) Act, 2010.

The investigation is to be conducted by a senior police officer of at least the rank of Additional Commissioner of Police.

The court further directed the state government to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the former GDA vice-chairperson who approved the disputed building-plan regularisation. It also ordered action against a police investigating officer over alleged failures in an earlier investigation.

These directions reflect the court's concern about the accountability of both private developers and public officials involved in approving and monitoring real estate projects.

Refunds for 85 Buyers Over Alleged Sale of Common Areas

In another significant part of the judgment, the court addressed allegations that common areas within the residential society had been sold to 85 buyers.

The court directed the authorities to constitute a three-member committee to identify the affected areas and assess the construction costs, where applicable.

The promoter has been directed to refund the sale consideration paid by the affected buyers, along with the assessed construction costs and interest at 10% per annum from the dates of payment.

The court also directed that any construction found to have been raised on the affected common areas be removed and that the areas subsequently be handed over to the society.

The directions are intended to address the financial and property-related consequences faced by residents as a result of the disputed transactions.

GDA Also Held Accountable

The High Court imposed costs of ₹50,000 on the Ghaziabad Development Authority for each of the 11 petitioners, payable within the stipulated period.

The court criticised the authority's handling of the case and observed that residents had been forced to endure prolonged disputes and legal expenses because of alleged regulatory failures.

The case raises broader questions about the effectiveness of building-plan scrutiny, the monitoring of construction activity and the process through which unauthorised deviations are approved or regularised.

Project Remains Incomplete After Years

The Gulmohar Greens dispute also highlights the difficulties faced by homebuyers when residential projects remain incomplete or lack the required completion certificates.

The court noted that the project had a long history of construction and approval-related disputes. It expressed concern over the promoter's failure to obtain a completion certificate, despite the legal obligations applicable to the project.

For homebuyers who invest their savings or take substantial housing loans, delays and disputes of this nature can create serious financial pressure. Residents may be required to service their home loans while simultaneously dealing with uncertainty over the legal status, completion and safety of their homes.

A Warning for Developers and Homebuyers

The ruling is likely to renew discussions about compliance and accountability in India's real estate sector. It reinforces the importance of obtaining valid approvals, adhering to sanctioned plans and protecting the rights of existing apartment owners.

For developers, the case illustrates that unauthorised construction may result in demolition, financial penalties, refund obligations and criminal investigation. For planning authorities, it highlights the need for transparent approvals and effective enforcement of building regulations.

Homebuyers, meanwhile, should undertake due diligence before purchasing property. This includes checking sanctioned building plans, the applicable occupancy or completion certificates, the legal status of common areas and the project's approvals with the relevant development authority.

The Allahabad High Court's decision in the Gulmohar Greens case sends a strong message that unauthorised construction cannot necessarily be legitimised through subsequent administrative approvals. With demolition, refunds, penalties and investigations ordered, the case serves as an important reminder that protecting homebuyers requires accountability from both real estate developers and regulatory authorities.

Post a Comment

0 Comments