Mumbai: Residents of Crescent Bay Tower 5 in Parel have secured relief from the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA), which has directed the project's developer to complete several long-pending repairs, safety measures and other deficiencies in the building and its common areas.
The order
was passed on September 3, 2026, by MahaRERA chairperson Manoj Saunik following
a complaint filed by Kamalesh Aga, chairperson of the L&T Crescent Bay T-5
Co-operative Housing Society, after receiving authorisation from society
members.
The dispute
concerns several issues that residents said remained unresolved despite
repeated follow-ups with the developer.
The housing
society sought action on five key matters that Permanent rectification of
recurring leakages, Completion of the automatic fire alarm system, Rectification
of other outstanding construction and infrastructure deficiencies, Proper
physical demarcation of the project's boundary, Recovery of outstanding dues
from defaulting neighboring towers and crediting the recovered amount to the
common-area fund
MahaRERA has
directed L&T Parel Project LLP, a joint venture between Larsen & Toubro
Realty and Omkar Realtors & Developers, to expedite and complete the
pending works.
Crescent Bay
Tower 5 received its occupancy certificate from the Slum Rehabilitation
Authority on March 15, 2018, while possession of apartments was handed over to
residents by September 4, 2018.
The larger
project had been registered with MahaRERA with a proposed completion date of
August 31, 2018. However, several complaints concerning the tower and common
areas continued even after residents moved into their homes.
One of the
significant aspects of the order relates to the timing of the residents'
complaints.
According to
the order, the society had raised concerns about defects before the expiry of
the applicable defect-liability periods—September 3, 2023, for individual
apartments and October 20, 2024, for common areas.
MahaRERA
held that because the defects had been brought to the developer's attention
within the prescribed period, the subsequent expiry of the defect-liability
period could not invalidate complaints that had already been raised but
remained unresolved.
The MahaRERA
direction comes nearly eight years after possession of Crescent Bay Tower 5
began, bringing renewed attention to post-possession responsibilities in large
residential developments.
The case
also underlines a broader issue in Mumbai's real estate market: obtaining
possession and an occupancy certificate does not necessarily bring an end to
disputes over defects that were reported within the applicable statutory
period.
For Crescent
Bay residents, the immediate focus now shifts to implementation of the MahaRERA
directions and completion of the outstanding works.
.png)
0 Comments